FOCUS: The FBI Could Fight Far-Right Violence if They Wanted to - but They Don't




Reader Supported News
17 August 19

We can't make producing an online news service free. We can be frugal and cost efficient - and we are - but it's going to cost something. At RSN the money comes from you and the influence does too.
Help out here.
Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News


If you would prefer to send a check:
Reader Supported News
PO Box 2043
Citrus Hts, CA 95611




Reader Supported News
17 August 19
It's Live on the HomePage Now:
Reader Supported News


FOCUS: The FBI Could Fight Far-Right Violence if They Wanted to - but They Don't 
A candlelight vigil after the mass shooting at a Walmart in El Paso, Texas. (photo: ABC)
Mike German, Guardian UK
German writes: "Federal law enforcement officials have all the tools necessary to address far-right violence proactively - as my own successful investigations as an FBI undercover agent in the 1990s indicate." 

EXCERPTS: 

The legacy of our government’s official sanction of white supremacy continues to linger, particularly infecting our criminal justice system and immigration policies. The FBI remains an overwhelmingly white, male organization, which may partly explain why it would treat white supremacist violence as a less serious concern than an imaginary Black Identity Extremist movement. Recent reports documenting law enforcement cooperation with violent far-right groups and antipathy toward their victims at riotous demonstrations in Sacramento, California, and in Portland, Oregon, demand investigation to see what role bias plays in the police response.

More troubling, recent reporting that revealed the active participation of police officers in white supremacist groups and racist social media activity by a small but significant number of police officers and border patrol officials makes clear that overt and organized racism continues to fester within agencies sworn to protect the public safety as well. The FBI has repeatedly warned its agents about white supremacist infiltration of law enforcement, urging caution about sharing sensitive intelligence about domestic terrorism cases. But it has taken few concrete actions to protect communities of color from these racist officers. Given this disturbing reality, giving law enforcement greater domestic terrorism powers may not be the safest or most effective solution.

Our latest Brennan Center report urged Congress to find ways the federal government can fund programs designed to repair the communal injuries that hate violence inflicts, by building social inclusion through investments in education, social services, and employment. When white supremacists use violence to divide us, our response should be designed to empower the victimized communities, not just the police.










Comments